

See also this comparison
page.
Thomas Avery has also performed measures on
5292 motors, see Lugnet
thread.
The roster

|
Electric Technic Motor 9V
Lugnet
Partsref 2838c01, Peeron
2838c01, Lego 74569
The older 9V Technic motor (1990).
Ungeared, it has a high rotation speed and low torque,
so for most applications it requires an external
gear reduction. |

|
Electric Technic Micromotor
Lugnet
Partsref 2986, Peeron
2986, Lego 70823
Appeared in 1993, this small, light
weight motor turns slowly and offer low torque -
but respectable torque for its size. Must be used
generally with pulley,
top
and base,
but other motion transmissions are possible (see
examples by Brian Sadowsky, with a 16t
gear/clutch or a pin
joiner) |

|
Electric Technic Mini-Motor 9v
Lugnet
Partsref 71427c01, Peeron
71427c01, Lego 71427
Since 1997, this motor replaces
2838. Geared down and quite efficient, this is the
motor of choice for most applications. |

|
Electric Technic Mini-Motor 9v
Lego 43362
In 2002, Lego replaced 71427 motor
with a new type, 43362. Externally almost identical,
its internal structure is
very different. Performances are almost as good,
and its weight is much lower. |

|
Electric RC Race Buggy Motor
Peeron
5292
Introduced in 2002, this motor appeared
with 8475
RC Race Buggy. Very powerful, it also consumes
a lot of energy. Not recommended for use with a
RCX which can't deliver the current needed by this
beast. The innermost shaft hole is geared up by
a 23/17 factor. Only the outermost output is tested
below. |

|
Electric Technic Motor 9V Geared
Peeron
47154
This motor was first included in
4094
Motor Movers set (2003). Provides an axle hole
with friction, allowing to choose axle length without
the need of an extender. Flat bottom allowing easy
mounting. |

|
NXT motor
This motor is specific to the NXT
set (2006). Includes a rotation encoder, returning
to the NXT the position of the shaft with 1°
resolution. Because of the special connector of
this motor (non-standard phone plug type), a cable
adapter is required to drive this motor with regular
9V sources. Not recommended for use with a RCX which
can't deliver the high current that this motor can
consume. Slow rotation speed, minimizing the need
of external gear train. |

|
Power Functions Medium motor
This motor belongs to a new range
of motors and control elements introduced in 2007,
the Power Functions. It uses a new 4 pins 9V connector
that provides permanent 9V supply to control elements
as well as controlled power to the motors (compatibility
with old 9V system is built in extension cords).
The Medium motor has holes for studless constructions
as well as 6x2 bottom plate. |

|
Power Functions XL motor
Big brother of Power Functions Medium
motor, it provides a lot of mechanical power. Actuated
by the same core as NXT motors, it rotates slightly
faster (less internal gear reduction). Mounting
is done through several pin holes. |

|
9V Train motor
Stefan Vorst measured performances
of the 9V Train motor. The results are below. |
Weight
 2838
|
 2986
|
 71427
|
 43362
|
 5292
|
48g |
10g |
42g |
28g |
55g |
 47154
|
 NXT
|
 PF Medium
|
 PF XL
|
 9V Train
|
40g |
80g |
31g |
69g |
72g |
Supposed to be equivalent to 71427, 43362 motor is 30% lighter.
This is generally an advantage, except when the motor is used
as a counterweight, or to balance the structure, for example
in COG-shifting walkers.
No-load characteristics
Test conditions: motor is powered by a variable, regulated
power supply. An ammeter measures current flowing through the
motor, a voltmeter monitors tension across. The rotation speed
is measured by a RCX equipped with a light sensor, looking at
an half-white/half
black cylinder.
9 V supply |
 2838
|
 2986
|
 71427
|
 43362
|
 5292
|
Rotation
speed (rotations per minute) |
4100 rpm |
35 rpm |
360 rpm |
340 rpm |
1300 rpm |
No-load current |
35 mA |
6 mA |
3.5 mA |
9 mA |
160 mA |
9 V supply |
 47154
|
 NXT
|
 PF Medium
|
 PF XL
|
 9V Train
|
Rotation
speed (rotations per minute) |
460 rpm |
170 rpm |
405 rpm |
220 rpm |
2000rpm |
No-load current |
31 mA |
60 mA |
65 mA |
80 mA |
90mA |
43362 has a higher no-load current than 71427, probably
caused by higher internal
friction. 47154 has a fairly high no-load current, because
of its 5-stages gear reduction. But it uses big-tooth gears
in the last stages, probably much more sturdy that the 2-stages,
thin-tooth 71427/43362 internal gearing. The 5292 also exhibit
very high no-load current, here again caused by internal friction.
This explains also the break in its speed/voltage curve.
As is usual for DC motors, rotation speed is proportionnal
to voltage applied to them, this can be seen on graphs below.
No-load current depends little on voltage.







Stalled characteristics
Stalled current consumption is simply measured with motor
axle shaft locked by hand. Stalled torque is established from
the maximum weight that can be lifted by the machine described
below. Note that stalled torque measure is VERY imprecise
(this is especially true for 5292 motor)
9 V supply |
 2838
|
 2986
|
 71427
|
 43362
|
 5292
|
Stalled
torque |
0.85 N.cm |
1.6 N.cm |
6 N.cm |
5.5 N.cm |
12 N.cm |
Stalled current |
700 mA |
80 mA |
360 mA |
340 mA |
3.2 A |
9 V supply |
 47154
|
 NXT
|
 PF Medium
|
 PF XL
|
 9V Train
|
Stalled
torque |
6 N.cm |
50 N.cm |
11 N.cm |
40 N.cm |
2.8 N.cm |
Stalled current |
580 mA |
2 A |
850 mA |
1.8 A |
950 mA |
Take care to avoid extended period stall condition, as power
dissipated in motor case is quite high (6 Watts for 2838, 3
W for 71427) will cause a rapid temperature rise. Note that
71427 and 43362 motors, equipped
with a thermistor, should be protected against frying (not
tested though !!!). 5292 motor is probably protected too, since
stalled current decreases quickly. 47154 protection can be seen
easily through clear case.
The NXT motor is also protected by a thermistor
(Raychem RXE065 or Bourns MF-R065).
That means that the high 2A current (and associated whooping
torque) can be sustained only for a few seconds. Same thing
for the Power Functions XL motor.
Loaded characteristics
Here is the setup used to measure motors under load. Electrical
power is measured with voltmeter and ammeter. Mechanical power
delivered by the motor is evaluated from the time used to lift
the weight by some height (5 cylinder turns - the first two
turns are not counted to eliminate initial acceleration). Torque
applied is obtained from weight and cylinder radius.
Cylinder is directly placed on motor axle shaft, except for
2838 motor where a 1/5 gear reduction was used. Additionnal
friction introduced may have somewhat impacted 2838 efficiency,
but anyway this gearing is necessary for most applications.
Torque displayed for this motor corrects gear reduction. The
fast 5292 motor was also measured with a 1/3 gear reduction.

 2838
|
Torque |
Rotation
speed |
Current |
Mechanical power |
Electrical power |
Efficiency |
6 V |
0.45 N.cm |
580
rpm |
0.32 A |
0.27 W |
1.9 W |
14 % |
7 V |
0.45 N.cm |
1000
rpm |
0.32 A |
0.46 W |
2.3 W |
20 % |
9 V |
0.45 N.cm |
2000
rpm |
0.32 A |
0.9 W |
3 W |
31 % |
12 V |
0.45 N.cm |
3300
rpm |
0.33 A |
1.5 W |
4 W |
39 % |
 PF XL
|
Torque |
Rotation speed |
Current |
Mechanical power |
Electrical power |
Efficiency |
4.5 V |
14.5 N.cm |
43 rpm |
0.52 A |
0.65 W |
2.34 W |
28 % |
7 V |
14.5 N.cm |
100 rpm |
0.54 A |
1.51 W |
3.78 W |
40 % |
9 V |
14.5 N.cm |
146 rpm
|
0.55 A |
2.21 W |
4.95 W |
45 % |
12 V |
14.5 N.cm |
214 rpm
|
0.56 A |
3.24 W |
6.72 W |
48 % |
 9V Train
|
Torque |
Rotation speed |
Current |
Mechanical power |
Electrical power |
Efficiency |
4.5 V |
0.90 N.cm |
375 rpm |
0.40 A |
0.36 W |
1.80 W |
20 % |
6 V |
0.90 N.cm |
667 rpm |
0.39 A |
0.62 W |
2.34 W |
27 % |
7.5 V |
0.90 N.cm |
1071 rpm
|
0.38 A |
0.99 W |
2.85 W |
35 % |
9 V |
0.90 N.cm |
1250 rpm
|
0.38 A |
1.11 W |
3.42 W |
33 % |
The speed of 43362 motor is about 12 % lower than speed
of 71427. Though this is in the range of variations measured
by Steve Baker among a bunch of nine
71427 motors, my measures on three 71427 and two 43362 showed
the 12 % difference between the two groups.
Speed and current vs.
torque


Protections
71427 and 43362 motors are protected from abuses by two devices:
- a PTC thermistance (here an Epcos
B1056). This resistor, mounted in series with the motor,
has a low value when it is cold (about 1.7 ohms), rapidly
increasing as temperature rises. When large current flows
through the motor, self heating rises thermistance temperature
and resistance value, so the current is limited by voltage
drop across thermistance.
- a BZW04-15B, bidirectional transient
voltage suppressor diode. This diode protects RCX from large
voltage spikes that could be generated by the motor. But
it also forbids applying more than 15V to the motor...
A similar protection is integrated in 47154 motors, as can
be seen on this photograph. NXT
motor is also protected with a PTC thermistance
and a transient voltage suppressor diode (D4 on this photograph).
Outputs of RCX are also protected from overload: the motor
driver chip used (Melexis MLX10402 - datasheet)
has a current limitation set to 500 mA, and a thermal shutdown
which disable the output if die temperature rises too much.
Here is the curve limitation that I measured on a RCX. It
was powered by an external regulated power supply, and tested
at 9V (6 alkaline batteries) and 7.2V (6 NiCd or NiMH rechargeable
batteries).

There is a significant voltage drop before reaching
current limitation knee (at about 500 mA). So a stalled 71427
motor receives only about 7V at 300 mA, while two paralleled
71427 or a single 2838 almost reach current limitation (5.5V
/ 430mA).
Once current limitation is established (for
example with a dead short), power dissipation in the driver
is very high, and it quickly enters thermal shutdown mode. After
that, the output cycles on/off with a period of about
1 second: the driver circuit heats up, stops output, cools down,
re-enables output, heats up again and so on.
You can also see on the graph that with a dead
short, the output can deliver slightly more than 500mA. So if
all three outputs are shorted, total consumed current is more
than 1.5A, exceeding rating of the fuse
that protects RCX. This condition should not happen in normal
circumstances, even with all three outputs loaded with 2 stalled
71427 motors...
I also had a look to current output capabilities
of 8475 RC
Race Buggy. Its main output drives two paralleled 5292 motors
that consumes more than 3A when stalled so it has to be beefy
! And indeed it seems to have a current limitation of about
4A, and a thermal shutdown providing on/off cycling like RCX
motor driver.
Getting maximum
mechanical power from RCX output
Using an illimited power supply (fresh batteries for example),
a DC motor provides maximum mechanical power when loaded at
half of its stall torque. This is also the load where rotating
speed is half of no-load speed (this assumes ideal conditions
such as low internal friction, but according to load curves
showed above, this is exact enough to be useful).
But with RCX output, some voltage drop occur as current increases,
and current limitation can also trigger in if two motors under
heavy load are paralleled on the same output.
Here are the curves showing mechanical power versus load
torque for various motor combinations. The RCX was externally
powered from a regulated power supply, and I measured mechanical
power at 9V (equivalent to 6 alkaline batteries) and 7.2V (6
NiCd or NiMH rechargeable batteries).

|
RCX powered by an external regulated power supply
through two fake batteries.
Caution: I shall not be held responsible
if you burn your RCX with incorrect voltage or bad
polarity ! |

|
The fake batteries where assembled from the sawed
ends of old alkaline batteries, maintained at the
right spacing with rods of hot melting glue.
Caution: batteries contain hazardous
chemicals that can be dangerous for your health.
Open them at your own risk and only if you know
what you are doing!!! |
You can see from the curves that although RCX can be operated
from NiMH batteries, the lower supply voltage translates in
a 40% cut down of available mechanical power .
Single motor curves





Paralleled motors curves
Two identical motor are powered from the same RCX output,
and their shaft are mechanically coupled.




Because of the higher current consumption of
47154 and 2838 motors, using two of them on the same RCX output
is not recommended, as they exceed RCX current limitation when
heavily loaded. At 0.8 W, tandem 71427 provide safely the greatest
mechanical power of all.
Conclusion
Each of these motors has unique characteristics which makes
it more or less suitable for different applications.
- Micromotor 2986 is at its best when space or weight
is at a premium. But its mechanical power is quite low.
- Technic motor 2838 is a real power hog, with poor efficiency,
but it can deliver 30% more power than Minimotor.
- Minimotor 71427 is probably the best performer of the
pack overall.
- The new 43362 is roughly equivalent to 71427, with slightly
degraded performances. But its light weight can be a boon
for many uses.
- Clear case 47154 provides a higher mechanical power
than 71427, but at the price of a somewhat lower efficiency.
- RC Race Buggy Motor 5292 is really powerful, but requires
a power supply up to the task. It's not a good idea to use
it with a RCX as the 500 mA current limitation won't let
it unleash its power...
- NXT motor delivers a high torque thanks to its internal
speed reduction gear train. Because of that, it also turns
slowly and efficiency is somewhat reduced. This motor could
be connected to RCX thanks to a compatibility cable, but
this is not recommended for use on a RCX because the high
current it can consume is too much for RCX 500 mA current
limitation.
Caution
! Though I tested motors with a 12V supply,
I can't guarantee that they bear the extra load
for extended time period. Use that
at your own risks ! |